Use case 1
Course Assignments
Replace the classmate role-play with a standardized AI client.
- Fair grading: every student meets the same client
- No video review: transcript and scores are automatic
- One place for feedback: comment right on the report
Use cases · Social work education
TMind AI gives BSW and MSW students realistic AI clients to practice with, and gives faculty scored, reviewable evidence of what each student can do, organized around the nine CSWE social work competencies.
Illustrative example
Use case 1
Replace the classmate role-play with a standardized AI client.
Use case 2
Prepare students before placement and practice what placements can't offer.
Use case 3
Score practice against the EPAS behaviors you already assess.
Use case 4
Add the simulated-practice measure AS 5.0.1(a) asks for.
How TMind supports each of the nine 2022 EPAS competencies.
AI clients · Video simulation
Each client comes with five sessions, 30 in total, and every competency is practiced with at least two clients. Select a client to meet them.
"Hi, I'm Elena. I have a five-year-old son, Diego. I've been raising him on my own, and... honestly, it's been really hard lately. Between work, bills, and everything else... I just don't know what to do anymore."
Primary competencies
| Client | C1Ethics | C2Rights | C3ADEI | C4Research | C5Policy | C6Engage | C7Assess | C8Intervene | C9Evaluate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clients per competency | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Every TMind session ends in a scored, faculty-reviewed report your program can use to show student competence.
Illustrative example
Less time on setup and grading, more time on teaching.
Describe the scenario in plain language, or start from a ready-made client. No scripting or actors needed.
Turn your existing rubric or the EPAS behaviors into evaluation metrics, so scores match how you already grade.
Transcripts and scored reports are generated after every session, so you read and comment instead of watching hours of recordings.
Comment inline on any report and share it with students or field instructors, with view or comment permissions.
Every student meets the same client at the same difficulty, so results are comparable across a cohort.
AI scores are a starting point. Instructors review and confirm every result before it counts.
Synchronous field seminar time, including simulations, and simulated tasks within a real practice setting can count, per the 2022 EPAS Interpretation Guide (AS 3.3.3). Independent practice outside those settings is supplemental. Your field director decides how hours are counted.
They can inform a simulated-demonstration measure under AS 5.0.1(a). Because faculty or field personnel must assess student competence, instructors review and confirm the results.
No. Every client is fictional and AI-generated, including the videos, so students can practice difficult conversations without risk to anyone.
Yes. Describe any client in plain language and choose the evaluation metrics. Setup takes about a minute.
CSWE does not require a specific course list; each program maps its own curriculum to the nine competencies. Programs most often use TMind in practice courses, field seminar, and specialized-practice courses.
Yes. Use it for generalist practice in BSW and MSW foundation courses, and build custom clients and metrics for each MSW area of specialized practice.
A web browser. Sessions run at app.tmind.ai.
Share an assignment from your syllabus and we'll show you how it runs in TMind,
from client setup to the faculty-reviewed report.
Standards cited: CSWE 2022 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards and the 2022 EPAS Interpretation Guide.
TMind AI is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Council on Social Work Education.